![]() Is this just a complete fucking waste of time, do I generate a self-signed cert and just leave it? Will that do anything with respect to my domain? (So obviously, yes this will be ftp on my domain, and no, it won't be public/anon, don't bother probing it etc.) Tim Which again, do nothing with the particular text fields I'm trying to figure out. Also, version 1.1.0 is apparently so new, nobody's even screenshotted it I see hits with the respective dialog for version 0.9.60-something. I'm not even seeing basic documents like what the fields are on the fucking dialog. ![]() I get it, but that's no excuse for utterly crippling your supposed-free ware. Is this just a question that is - and I've somehow managed to miss this - so immediately, patently obvious, that no one dares ask it? As near as I can tell - besides the fact that it says LE integration right there - it wants a x.509 cert, that LE provides, and so, I should be very reasonably assuming, that it can just, *hands bumping together gesture, "now kiss"* and, that'd be that, right? Is it hidden by intent, not coincidence? I notice Filezilla is doing this "Pro" shit and I'm guessing, besides integration of commercial services, they want money for support too. Am I just a complete idiot? I know I don't know much about certificates and keys, as actually used by applications. Thanks.) No one is talking about this, any conceivable query I search on returns irrelevant results: sure, configure LE integration, but I don't want that configure a 3rd-party cert (with all the related files included as a package), no not quite the same thing it seems like the more insistent I am, trying to query this one narrow subject, the harder it pushes me towards something completely not that. It seems to do nothing about an incorrect file, and one of them seems to use the *.pem but without the *.key it emits some random bullshit gnuTLS error. (From what I've seen in searching, it seems to want a *.key and *.pem respectively. Do those work? It doesn't even tell me what extensions it's looking for. Right? LE doesn't make a private key file though. Well, I don't need to administer it that way either, I can just point it to the same files then. ![]() hmm, no, I can't just link it with my existing account, it looks like it has to make a completely new one? Weird. I already have an account for that, even. I see an option for Let's Encrypt, integrating the ACME interface. Let's go get the current version and see. I've used FZ before, seems reasonable enough.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |